Recently we had the General Session of the United Nations, in a way special, as it was 80 years after it was established. I must confess I am not enamored in any way in UN and regard its activities over last 25 years or so as counterproductive to its declared goals in most cases (and at best). It was a very good forum for communication during cold war years and sometimes it was indispensable. Also some of its divisions and agents achieved wonderful things, notably WHO when it led a way to smallpox eradication. However, after the cold war years were over UN had problems with reinventing its mission for the first ten years or so and later acted as political forum of questionable ethics and quality. Still, you may not share my view (but if you'd like to comment please do). What is of interest for this blog is who and how was referring to Israel-Hamas war during the recent session (and earlier).
So, usually the General Session should allow representatives of countries to address what they consider especially important for the countries they represent. All their speeches may be found on the UN site and you may listen to them if you wish. I did to few of them, some with interest, some with incredulity for various reasons, all in preparation for this entry.
Israel was represented by its PM Benjamin Netanyahu. I am, to put it mildly, not a fan of the present PM of Israel and probably we would have disagree on most issues if we'd ever meet in person (we won't, but just if). Still, whoever wrote his speech did a marvelous job and I could not help agreeing with almost each and every statement he made. It was long, but was dealing precisely and informatively with present Israeli situation and the history of conflict. He was delivering this speech to empty chairs (mostly) as many representatives of other countries ostentatiously left the room. I have no slightest doubt that they were at the time or later checking his speech, themselves or through proxies, as taking part in politics require such things (OK, I may be wrong but I assume they still do at least part of their job). The gesture was for the show. But what does such gesture tell us? That the assembly of the nations' representatives which were willing at one time or another to listen to Qaddafi, Khomeini, Taliban, Arafat (at the time when he was nothing else but a terrorist), Fidel Castro, Khrushchev banging his shoe and so on and so on. They stayed and listened. When the PM of the democratic state, even not liked (the PM, not the state, the enmity towards Israel is much bigger issue than lack of sympathy towards one or the other PM), takes stand people who are professional politicians and diplomats behave like children in kindergarten. They don't question, they don't push for clarification, they just leave. Pathetic.
Still, other speeches were of even more interest to me.
There we had President Recep Erdogan from Turkey. He is known for being president for the last 24 years, massacre of Curds, islamization of Turkey and distancing from Ataturk reforms, dismantling courts, putting political opponents and their supporters to prison, sustaining criminalization of so much as a mention of the genocide of Armenians, diverging from NATO. Has he mentioned Turkey's affairs? Not at all. His whole speech was dedicated to demonization and accusation of Israel.
There we had President Ahmad Al-Sharaa from Syria. Famous for his part in creating and spreading ISIS, crimes against humanity during ISIS rule, who until recently was wanted by the United States with the price of 10 million dollars for his head. He was talking peace, unity and tolerance (none of which he supported, to put it mildly, in his life so far) and at the same time accusing Israel of crimes.
There we had Sergei Lavrov, Russian Foreign Minister, representing the country that attacked Ukraine, the very country they guaranteed the borders of, the country which on average once a week threatens Europe with nuclear weapons and invasion. He was accusing West generally of all type of crimes and Israel specifically about bombing and starvation of Palestinians. Let me just remind you that the same Russia sought and received (together with Syrian President Assad at the time) to engage Hezbollah to murder Palestinians in refugee camp in Syria for their revolt against Assad.
There we had Egyptian representative, Badr Ahmed Mohammed Abdelatty, who was speaking about "Palestinian brethren who are falling victims to heinous action" and accused Israel of "war against defenseless civilians for the sin they did not commit". Let me just remind you that we are talking about the country who holds the same blockade for Gaza since 2007 for the same reasons as Israel. The country who does not allow civilians from Gaza to enter its territory, and never did open itself to Arab refugees from former mandate though it controlled Gaza for 20 years. Some brethren.
Of course for the above mentioned speeches nobody left the room or even asked a single question.
I could make fun of the representative of Indonesia, who mentioned the "right to life, freedom and pursuit of happiness" as the rights arising from the UN Declaration of Human Rights (well, I do remember the American Declaration of Independence quite well) and his claiming that these rights codified by UN gave inspiration to many revolutions, among them the French one, the Russian one and the Chinese one. Obviously he knows history no better than other representatives in UN (judging by their actions or lack of thereof). Still I can only thank him for being the only one (sic!) I have heard mentioning Sudan, the worst ongoing humanitarian crisis, and declaring Indonesia's willingness to send 20,000 troops as peacekeepers to Gaza or Sudan. Indonesia is not the country known for meticulous administration of human rights, yet judging by the speech it is far better than most.
That would have been funny if not so tremendously sad.
No comments:
Post a Comment