Reaction at October 7, not what you might think

 There exist now widespread legend that Israel met with international sympathy after the horrible attack of October 7, and only later prolonged war and reported casualties among Gazans changed how the West perceives the situation. Connected to this legend are two others: that Israel went to war with Gaza almost immediately after the attack and that Hezbollah's assault on Israel (rockets on the north of the country) was a response to the war in Gaza (mainly because Hezbollah repeatedly stated so). Let's examine all these legends.

1.  Israel had world's sympathy and support right after the attack. While obviously many people all over the world were horrified by what has happened on October 7, and many countries expressed formal condolences as per diplomatic protocol, this reaction was as far from universal as may be in similar circumstances.

On October 7, 2023 the first anti-Israeli manifestation (when the battles in Israel with the terrorists who infiltrated from Gaza were still raging) took place in London; on October 8 - in Manchester and New York. In Manchester Richard Barnard, far-left activist, co-founder of Palestinian Action (now designated as terrorist organization which is being defended by Banksy!) stated his happiness because of murder of over one thousand Israelis (at this time the number was unknown) stating: “When we hear the resistance, the Al-Aqsa flood, we must turn that flood into a tsunami of the whole world.” 

In Europe and in the US during October 2023 and later (but I focus here on the initial period BEFORE even the ground invasion started) posters of Israeli hostages were ripped off the walls and poster signs, including the posters showing the youngest hostage - 9 months old Kfir Bibas.

 While in UK and many other European places the first to applaud and celebrate the massacre were often local Muslims and far-left activists in the USA the first to condemn the victim were professors and students from the most famous (and expensive) American universities.

On October 7, when the massacre and fighting were still going on the following statements were made by some professors:

* Zareena Grewal, Associate Professor of American Studies, Ethnicity, Race, & Migration and Religious Studies at Yale University in response to the tweet "civilians are civilians" wrote: “Settlers are not civilians. This is not hard" . She is known to support BDS and condemn the co-initiative of Muslims and Jews to organize inter-faith dialogue. She is still a Yale professor despite 55,000 students calling for her removal.

* Danny Shaw, Adjunct Lecturer of Latin American and Caribbean Studies and Race, Ethnicity, Class and Gender at the City University of New York tweeted on October 16, 9 days after murderous escapade:

 

* Russell Rickford, Associate Professor of History at Cornell University on October 15, a week after the attack, gave a speech in which he confessed: "It was exhilarating. It was exhilarating, it was energizing."

*  Jemma DeCristo, Assistant Professor of American Studies at University of California, Davis called for intimidation and violence against journalists reporting on killing Jews by Hamas:

 Also on the 7th of October, dozens of Harvard students' associations issued a statement that they hold Israeli government "entirely responsible for all unfolding violence" . It is absolutely permissible to not like Israeli government or criticize it (I am among its strong critics) but holding it responsible for attack by terrorist on the citizens of Israel is equal to blaming Ukrainian government for Russian attack on Ukraine and atrocities in Ukrainian cities like Bucha. 

Student demonstrations and encampments soon followed not only expressing support for creating Palestine state (nothing wrong with this) or showing sympathy for Palestinian civilians and non-combatants (also nothing wrong with this, it is still well inside the free speech boundaries) but praising Hamas, Hezbollah and calling for genocide towards Jews and Israelis with slogans like "from the river to the sea", "globalize the intifada", "we are all Hamas" etc.

In December these led to presidents of Harvard, UPenn and MIT testifying on Capitol Hill about rising antisemitism on their campuses, an issue that has plagued institutions of higher learning. During the infamous hearing none of the three answered straightforwardly to the question "is calling for the genocide of Jews violation of the code of conduct of their respective universities". The answers were that it is "context dependent" or the speech needs to turn into conduct. Here you may read the transcript of answers to this simple question. And now imagine calling in similar way on campus and encampments, including personal threats, against Muslims, African-Americans, Hindu, homosexuals or almost anybody else. The reaction would have been instantaneous, and rightly so. Just not when it comes to Jews or Israelis.

2. Beginning of the war. After October 7 Israel started airstrikes on Gaza but the ground offensive took some time. Partially because for the first two days fighting against terrorist was taking place still inside Israel, partially because different strategies were evaluated. The land incursion started on October 27, almost 3 weeks after the attack. In this time some hostage videos were released by Hamas, e.g. of injured hostage Mia Shem, some Gazans were killed in airstrikes, a major hit to one of Gaza's hospitals was delivered by Islamic Jihad rocket falling short (and immediately Israel was accused, though later it was proved that it had nothing to do with it).

3. Hezbollah "solidarity with Gaza". On October 8 Hezbollah started its bombing of the Northern Israel claiming that it does so "in solidarity with attacked Gaza". The problem was nobody was attacking Gaza at the time, it was Hamas from Gaza attacking Israel. The rockets led to major destruction across Northern Israel, many casualties (including 12 children killed on soccer field), evacuation of some 100,000 Israelis from along northern border and finally a major war with Hezbollah in the last quarter of the previous year. Yet for the longest time and up to today the western media were repeating the narrative about Hezbollah reacting to attack on Gaza, the fundamentally untrue statement.

Most of you  probably remember 9/11 or at least is very familiar with its story. Now imagine for a second that on this disastrous September day, which anniversary will be in 2 more days, when the towers were burning and collapsing, people jumping from the windows, firefighters bravely running to their death, as we know now, air traffic diverted and American air space closed and phone signals in New York collapsed people in Europe, Israel, Australia, New Zealand and other places would be saying it is all US fault, all violence is  on US government (even if you didn't like it or voted for it), and actually celebrating the carnage. That your allies instead of offering help in NATO structures (the only time ever art. 5 of the treaty was activated) were organizing or at least tolerating and protecting anti-American demonstrations in front of American embassies world wide. Not later, when Osama bin Laden was killed or when the war in Afghanistan started or evolved badly, on the very 9/11 (the demonstration in London was held on October 7 and it was anti-Israeli). 

Actually, if you have hard time imagining it let me show you such celebration. This  and this is how Palestinians were celebrating 9/11.